Editorial for ICPC NAQ 2016 G - Inverse Factorial
                Remember to use this editorial only when stuck, and not to copy-paste code from it. Please be respectful to the problem author and editorialist.
Submitting an official solution before solving the problem yourself is a bannable offence.
        Submitting an official solution before solving the problem yourself is a bannable offence.
- It is guaranteed that the number of digits of 
is at most
. This implies that
(found by experimentation).
 - A naive approach computing factorials will be too slow, due to the overhead of big integer arithmetic.
 - Instead we can notice that, when 
, each factorial can be uniquely identified by its length (i.e. number of digits).
 - The length of an integer 
can be computed as
.
 - Let
 - Then the length of 
is
.
 - Using the fact that 
, we can successively compute
, until we find the factorial with the required length.
 - Each step takes 
time, and the answer will be found in at most
steps.
 - Handle 
as special cases. As
, make sure you output
when the input is
(the output should be positive).
 
Comments