Editorial for ICPC NAQ 2016 G - Inverse Factorial
Remember to use this editorial only when stuck, and not to copy-paste code from it. Please be respectful to the problem author and editorialist.
Submitting an official solution before solving the problem yourself is a bannable offence.
Submitting an official solution before solving the problem yourself is a bannable offence.
- It is guaranteed that the number of digits of is at most . This implies that (found by experimentation).
- A naive approach computing factorials will be too slow, due to the overhead of big integer arithmetic.
- Instead we can notice that, when , each factorial can be uniquely identified by its length (i.e. number of digits).
- The length of an integer can be computed as .
- Let
- Then the length of is .
- Using the fact that , we can successively compute , until we find the factorial with the required length.
- Each step takes time, and the answer will be found in at most steps.
- Handle as special cases. As , make sure you output when the input is (the output should be positive).
Comments